HZO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Camping World Holdings has a net margin of 0.71% compared to MarineMax's net margin of 0.32%. MarineMax's return on equity of 4% beat Camping World Holdings's return on equity of -12.2%.

MarineMax has a consensus price target of $38.50, signalling upside risk potential of 18.94%. On the other hand Camping World Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $28.08 which suggests that it could grow by 23.61%. Given that Camping World Holdings has higher upside potential than MarineMax, analysts believe Camping World Holdings is more attractive than MarineMax.

MarineMax has a beta of 1.895, which suggesting that the stock is 89.547% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Camping World Holdings has a beta of 2.495, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 149.513%.

MarineMax has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Camping World Holdings offers a yield of 2.2% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. MarineMax pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Camping World Holdings pays out 316.78% of its earnings as a dividend.

MarineMax quarterly revenues are $563.1M, which are smaller than Camping World Holdings quarterly revenues of $1.7B. MarineMax's net income of $4M is lower than Camping World Holdings's net income of $5.5M. Notably, MarineMax's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.62x while Camping World Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MarineMax is 0.31x versus 0.28x for Camping World Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Envela has a net margin of 0.71% compared to MarineMax's net margin of 3.59%. MarineMax's return on equity of 4% beat Envela's return on equity of 13.11%.

MarineMax has a consensus price target of $38.50, signalling upside risk potential of 18.94%. On the other hand Envela has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 6.95%. Given that MarineMax has higher upside potential than Envela, analysts believe MarineMax is more attractive than Envela.

MarineMax has a beta of 1.895, which suggesting that the stock is 89.547% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Envela has a beta of 0.310, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 69.042%.

MarineMax has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Envela offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. MarineMax pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Envela pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

MarineMax quarterly revenues are $563.1M, which are larger than Envela quarterly revenues of $46.9M. MarineMax's net income of $4M is higher than Envela's net income of $1.7M. Notably, MarineMax's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.62x while Envela's PE ratio is 31.17x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MarineMax is 0.31x versus 1.19x for Envela. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Forza X1 has a net margin of 0.71% compared to MarineMax's net margin of --. MarineMax's return on equity of 4% beat Forza X1's return on equity of --.

MarineMax has a consensus price target of $38.50, signalling upside risk potential of 18.94%. On the other hand Forza X1 has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 2400%. Given that Forza X1 has higher upside potential than MarineMax, analysts believe Forza X1 is more attractive than MarineMax.

MarineMax has a beta of 1.895, which suggesting that the stock is 89.547% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Forza X1 has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

MarineMax has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Forza X1 offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. MarineMax pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Forza X1 pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

MarineMax quarterly revenues are $563.1M, which are larger than Forza X1 quarterly revenues of --. MarineMax's net income of $4M is higher than Forza X1's net income of -$895.7K. Notably, MarineMax's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.62x while Forza X1's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MarineMax is 0.31x versus -- for Forza X1. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lazydays Holdings has a net margin of 0.71% compared to MarineMax's net margin of -8.28%. MarineMax's return on equity of 4% beat Lazydays Holdings's return on equity of -95.45%.

MarineMax has a consensus price target of $38.50, signalling upside risk potential of 18.94%. On the other hand Lazydays Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $10.00 which suggests that it could grow by 1085.26%. Given that Lazydays Holdings has higher upside potential than MarineMax, analysts believe Lazydays Holdings is more attractive than MarineMax.

MarineMax has a beta of 1.895, which suggesting that the stock is 89.547% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lazydays Holdings has a beta of 1.985, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 98.459%.

MarineMax has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Lazydays Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. MarineMax pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lazydays Holdings pays out -4.35% of its earnings as a dividend.

MarineMax quarterly revenues are $563.1M, which are larger than Lazydays Holdings quarterly revenues of $213.5M. MarineMax's net income of $4M is higher than Lazydays Holdings's net income of -$17.7M. Notably, MarineMax's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.62x while Lazydays Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MarineMax is 0.31x versus 0.01x for Lazydays Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.